Safe robots,shipped.

AI-enabled safety and quality engineering for robotics teams deploying fast. Know your requirements early, build with the rigor of regulated industries, and have evidence ready when a customer, regulator, or insurer asks how safety and liability were handled.

Book time
System modeling

Model your system.

One model of what your robot senses, does, and operates in. Everything that follows runs on it.

Regulatory analysis

Where will this robot operate?

Where you deploy decides which rules apply, and who gets a say. We read the whole stack, federal to city, and tell you which of it binds.

Scenario mapping and coverage

We map every scenario.

Every situation your robot can meet, generated rather than brainstormed, and measured for how much of it you cover.

Hazard analysis

What can go wrong, and what to do about it.

For each thin spot, the hazards step by step, each with a constraint and an owner.

Risk modeling

How much risk is left?

Rated and rolled up across the map. A register an insurer can audit, and a safety case behind it.

Standards compliance and certification

Which standards bind?

Fewer than the list suggests. We find the ones that bind and turn them into requirements you can test.

Traceability and continuous compliance

One living model, not four piles of paper.

Every claim is a chain you can walk, clause to part to code to test. Change one part and the model shows what it unsettled.

UL 4600Safety case for fully autonomous products UL 3300Service, communication, and information robots ISO 26262Functional safety for road vehicles ISO 10218Industrial robot safety SOTIF · ISO 21448Safety of the intended functionality ISO 12100Machinery risk assessment and reduction ISO 13849-1Safety-related parts of control systems ISO 3691-4Driverless industrial trucks and AMRs R15.06 / R15.08ANSI/RIA industrial and mobile robot safety EU Machinery Reg. + AI ActUnion-level machinery and AI requirements
Hover a standard to see what it covers.

What you get

The bar

Which regulations and standards bind where you deploy, translated into requirements you can test.

The gaps

Scenario coverage, and hazard analysis against it with STPA and FMEA, with constraints, owners, and residual risk in one register.

The evidence

Requirements, hazards and tests mapped to the clauses they answer, feeding a safety case that regenerates when anything changes.

Tell us what you are building, and where it is going.

Describe your system in four short answers and we will send you a brief: which rules bind where you are deploying, what your scenario space looks like, and what we would probe first. It takes a few minutes to generate and arrives at your work email.

Or book time

Built by operators

Safety and system validation for construction-zone autonomy. Safety-critical software shipped to regulated industries. Built by people who have carried this work to deployment.

Engaged today across delivery robots, industrial robotics, and automotive ADAS. We leave your team stronger than we found it.

Experience from

Cruise Rivian Faraday Future RTI

Backed by

Berkeley SkyDeck NVIDIA Inception Program

Your brief

Tell us what you are building

Four short answers, then where to send the brief.

The more you tell us, the sharper the brief. What it does, how it senses and decides, where it runs, and what you have already been asked for.